Studios, live sound venues and homes all have magnetic fields that can cause interference. Magnetic fields are produced whenever current flows through a wire. AC power cables, transformers, power supplies, computers, portable chargers, motors and light dimmers are among the devices that can emit strong magnetic fields. A microphone cable can pick up magnetic interference if it happens to pass near one of these devices. Cables can also pick up magnetic fields when they run adjacent to AC power. Top-quality star-quad cables can reduce this magnetic interference by at least 20 to 30 dB. This is almost always enough to reduce the interference to inaudible levels.
Balanced microphone cables are commonly used to carry low-level microphone signals. Magnetic interference is often a problem with microphone feeds because of the very low signal levels produced by microphones. Microphone outputs must be amplified by 20 to 60 dB to reach a line level. When a microphone feed is amplified, any magnetically-induced interference will also be amplified. In our opinion, star-quad cables should always be used for microphone feeds.
Balanced line-level interconnect use microphone cables to carry signals that are typically 20 to 60 dB higher than microphone feeds. Magnetic interference is usually not noticeable on a line-level interconnect unless the interference is severe. But, severe levels of magnetic interference can occur when line-level cables pass through crowded equipment racks, long cable trays, or in close proximity to lighting systems. We highly recommend using star-quad cables for balanced line-level interconnects. In our opinion, star-quad cables provide low-cost insurance against magnetic interference problems.
It is also unwise to equip a facility with a mix of star quad and standard microphone cables. In most cases the standard cables will work for the line-level interconnects, but these cables will inevitably wind up connected to a microphone. If all of the cables are star quad, they will be interchangeable between microphone and line-level applications.
There are a variety of different balanced microphone cables on the market. All microphone cables are designed to provide shielding against radio-frequency (RF) interference. The conductors are twisted and then wrapped with foil, a spiral of copper wires, or with a full copper braid. Of these, the braided shield is the most effective against electrostatic RF fields. However, none of these electrostatic shields are effective against magnetic interference. They are not magnetic shields!
Foil or copper shields cannot block the magnetic interference produced by devices that are relatively close to the cable. Magnetic fields easily flow through foil and copper shields causing interference.
Star-quad microphone cables are specially designed to provide immunity to magnetic fields. These microphone cables have 4 conductors arranged in a precise geometry that provides immunity to the magnetic fields which easily pass through the outer RF shield. Four conductors are arranged in a four pointed star configuration and the wires at opposite points of the star are connected together at each end of the cable. When the cables are wired in this manner, the + and - legs of the balanced connection each receive equal induced voltages from any magnetic field. This configuration balances the interference to the + and - legs of the balanced connection. The key to the success of star-quad cable is the fact that the magnetically-induced interference is exactly the same on the + and - legs of the balanced connection. The star-quad geometry of the cable keeps the interference signal identical on both legs no matter what direction the magnetic interference is coming from.
An equal signal on both legs of a balanced circuit is known as a common-mode signal. Balanced inputs are designed to reject common-mode signals, and this means that common-mode interference will be rejected. Balanced inputs use a transformer or a differential amplifier to reject common-mode signals while passing the normal-mode signals that carry the audio. Star-quad cables produce a nearly-perfect common-mode interference signal when exposed to a magnetic field. This common-mode interference is almost entirely rejected by the balanced input.
Normal (non star quad) microphone cables have two conductors surrounded by an electrostatic shield (just like the shield on a star-quad cable). Remember that the shield has no function from a magnetic standpoint, so we need to look at this cable as if it were just two closely-spaced wires. One wire carries the + leg and one wire carries the - leg.
If the source of the magnetic interference is closer to one wire than the other, the closer wire will receive a larger induced voltage. If the induced voltage does not match between the + and - legs, it will not be fully rejected at the balanced input. The induced voltage in the two legs will only match when the two wires are both an equal distance from the source of the magnetic interference.
In theory, it is possible to rotate a 2-wire cable to minimize the interference, but this is not a practical way of solving magnetic interference problems. Minimum and maximum sensitivity are only separated by a 90 degree rotation of the cable. We can't run around the stage or the studio moving and rotating cables every time we encounter magnetic interference. We need cables that provide immunity to magnetic fields coming from all directions.
We can change the spacing between the two wires in a traditional microphone cable and this will change the magnetic susceptibility. If we put more space between the wires, we make the problem worse. With a wide spacing, one wire will see a much larger induced voltage than the other. If the induced voltages don't match, they will not be rejected by the balanced input.
If we move the two wires in our microphone wire closer together, the difference in the distance to the source of magnetic interference is reduced and the magnetic susceptibility is improved. If we could put both wires in exactly the same location, both wires would see exactly the same induced voltage, and the interference would be completely rejected by our balanced circuit.
The solution to magnetic interference is to build a cable so that both legs of the balanced circuit have the same geometric center. If both wires could occupy the same physical space, they would experience identical induced voltages forming a common-mode signal that would be completely rejected by our balanced input. Since we can't put two wires in the same place, we have to get creative.
The solution is to replace each wire in the microphone cable with a pair of wires. This means that our microphone cable will need 4 wires (two for each leg). The geometric center of a pair of wires lies in the empty space between the two wires:
If we arrange our two pairs of wire in a star quad configuration, the geometric centers of both pairs will be in exactly the same location (the center of the cable):
We have now effectively placed two wires in one location. Both pairs of wires will now respond identically to a magnetic field from any direction. The magnetic interference will induce a common-mode voltage, but will not induce a normal-mode voltage. The common-mode interference signal will be rejected by the balanced input, and our system will be immune to magnetic interference. It is a clever trick, and it really works well!
The opposite points of the star must be shorted together at each end of the cable. Each shorted pair forms one leg of the balanced circuit. The cable Benchmark uses has a pair of white wires and a pair of blue wires. If you look carefully at the cross section of the cable you will see that the white wires are on opposite points of the star. Likewise, the blue wires are opposite each other. The white wires should be connected to the + leg (pin 2 of the XLR connectors), and the blue wires should be connected to the - leg (pin 3 of the XLR connectors). If any wire is incorrectly connected at either end, the cable will be very susceptible to magnetic interference. In most cases, an improperly wired star-quad cable will be worse than a standard two-wire cable.
Some star-quad cables have a different color code, which can easily lead to wiring errors. These cables use a different color for each of the four wires, and this makes it harder to determine which wires should be connected together. Some cables use the colors red, blue, white and green. The red and blue wires are on opposite points of the star and must be shorted together at each end of the cable. Likewise, the white and green wires are on opposite points of the star and must be shorted together at each end of the cable. These four-color cables can lead to wiring errors, so follow the cable manufacturer's wiring instructions carefully. Remember, a miswired star-quad cable will have more magnetic susceptibility than most 2-wire cables.
The star-quad geometry must be accurately maintained over the entire length of the cable. In the Canare L-4E6S cable, 5 filler strands keep the geometry well controlled. These fillers also provide a very significant improvement in the mechanical strength:
The accuracy of the star-quad geometry is a major factor determining the magnetic immunity of the balanced cable system. Some star-quad cables omit these important filler strands that maintain the geometry. For this reason, some star-quad cables are much better than others. Tests have shown that the magnetic immunity provided by Canare L-4E6S is typically 10 dB better than that provided by Mogami Neglex 2534 star quad cable.
Benchmark has selected Canare L-4E6S cable because of its strength, durability, flexibility, and superior immunity to magnetic interference.
Benchmark has recorded a lab demonstration that shows what happens when a standard two-wire cable is exposed to common sources of magnetic interference.
You will be able to hear the interference, see it on an oscilloscope, and view its spectrum on an FFT. A star-quad cable and a standard cable are exposed to the same sources of magnetic interference and the results are compared. This demonstration shows the dramatic difference between the two cables. The star-quad cable provided a 20 to 50 dB reduction in magnetic interference, keeping the interference below audible levels.
Note: The interference will play through the left channel while John narrates on the right channel.
This is really the wrong question to be asking. In most cases, star quad cables will not change the sound, they will only reduce interference. If no interference is present, any differences will only be a function of cable capacitance and the source impedance. Very long cables can introduce enough capacitance to attenuate high audio frequencies. In many cases, star-quad cables have some additional capacitance per foot. But, a loss in frequency response over a long cable run can be corrected with EQ. In contrast, interference cannot be removed.
Wikipedia: "Star Quad Cable"
Secrets contributor Sumit Chawla recently caught up with Benchmark’s VP and Chief Designer, John Siau to get a little more in-depth on several subjects.
Q: "Benchmark is one of the few companies that publishes an extensive set of measurements, but you also balance that with subjective testing. Can you talk about the equipment, the listening room, and the process for subjective testing?"
Q: "Was there ever a time where you learned something from a subjective test that was not captured by measurements?"
Q: "You conducted some listening tests to determine whether distortion in the “First Watt” was audible. What test material did you use for this, and what did you find?"
Q: "The AHB2 amplifier incorporates THX Audio Achromatic Amplifier technology. When and how did the partnership with THX come about?"
Q: "Linear power supplies have been and remain quite popular in high-end devices. You favor switch-mode power supplies. When and why did you make this switch?"
... and more!
At Benchmark, listening is the final exam that determines if a design passes from engineering to production. When all of the measurements show that a product is working flawlessly, we spend time listening for issues that may not have shown up on the test station. If we hear something, we go back and figure out how to measure what we heard. We then add this test to our arsenal of measurements.
Benchmark's listening room is equipped with a variety of signal sources, amplifiers and loudspeakers, including the selection of nearfield monitors shown in the photo. It is also equipped with ABX switch boxes that can be used to switch sources while the music is playing.
Benchmark's lab is equipped with Audio Precision test stations that include the top-of-the-line APx555 and the older AP2722 and AP2522. We don't just use these test stations for R&D - every product must pass a full set of tests on one of our Audio Precision test stations before it ships from our factory in Syracuse, NY.
Paul Seydor of The Absolute Sound interviews John Siau, VP and chief designer at Benchmark Media Systems. The interview accompanies Paul's review of the LA4 in the December, 2020 issue of TAS.
"At Benchmark, listening is the final exam that determines if a design passes from engineering to production. But since listening tests are never perfect, it’s essential we develop measurements for each artifact we identify in a listening test. An APx555 test set has far more resolution than human hearing, but it has no intelligence. We have to tell it exactly what to measure and how to measure it. When we hear something we cannot measure, we are not doing the right measurements. If we just listen, redesign, then repeat, we may arrive at a solution that just masks the artifact with another less-objectionable artifact. But if we focus on eliminating every artifact that we can measure, we can quickly converge on a solution that approaches sonic transparency. If we can measure an artifact, we don't try to determine if it’s low enough to be inaudible, we simply try to eliminate it."
- John Siau