This application note addresses these common questions and presents some guidelines for selecting headphones with the proper impedance and sensitivity.
Portable music players, smart phones, tablets, and laptop computers often require low-impedance headphones. Acoustic output level is a function of input power. Low-impedance headphones can deliver more power from the small voltage swing that is available from battery-operated devices. Unfortunately, the low impedance demands high current from the headphone amplifier, and this often leads to high distortion.
In contrast, many high-quality headphones, such as the Sennheiser HD 650 are intended for studio use and have much higher input impedances. Large voltage swings are always used in professional audio equipment. High voltage signals overcome the low-level noise that is produced by all electronic devices. Large voltage swings make it easier to achieve a very high signal to noise ratio (SNR). When large voltage swings are available, high-impedance headphones can take full advantage of the available dynamic range. High-impedance headphones are easier to drive than low-impedance headphones because they usually draw less current from the headphone amplifier for a given loudness. This often means that distortion will be lower when using high-impedance headphones. High-impedance headphones are a great choice if your headphone amplifier can supply enough voltage to drive them.
The good news is that high-impedance headphones will never overload or damage a portable device. Battery life may be increased, distortion may decrease, noise may be decrease, and the SNR may improve. The bad news is that the maximum playback level may be too low. Bottom line - if you have a pair of high-impedance headphones, try them with your portable devices. If the playback level is loud enough, high-impedance headphones should improve the overall sound quality of your portable device. But beware, the maximum playback level may be too low when driving high-impedance headphones from a portable device.
The answer to this question is somewhat more complicated. Fortunately, high-quality gear usually comes with detailed audio specifications. Check the manufacturers recommendations for "minimum headphone impedance". Do not attempt to use headphones that have a lower impedance than this minimum recommended impedance. Impedances below the manufacturer's recommended minimum may overload and damage the headphone amplifier. Some headphone amplifiers such as those produced by Benchmark, include short-circuit and overload protection. These circuits protect the amplifier from damage caused by incorrect loads. Remember, low-impedance headphones may damage some amplifiers, so use caution.
Low-impedance headphones may degrade the performance of a headphone amplifier. In general, amplifier output stage noise will be reproduced at higher levels as headphone impedance decreases. Distortion may increase due to the higher current required to drive low-impedance headphones. Low-impedance headphones may force the user to operate with the volume control turned down well below normal. Some high-quality headphone amplifiers, such as Benchmark's HPA2™ (included in most Benchmark DAC2 converters), have circuits that avoid these problems. The Benchmark HPA2™ is well-equipped to drive high or low impedance headphones.
I have a wide selection of headphones here at Benchmark, so I grabbed a few and plugged them into my Samsung S4 Android phone. All of the headphones I tested were loud enough for me while listening in a quiet office environment, but some may not be loud enough for all users in all situations. The headphones with marginal loudness were Sennheiser HD 650, Sennheiser HD 600, Audeze LCD-X, and Grado SR325 . These four are excellent headphones, but they may not provide a high enough playback level in some portable applications. In contrast, I found that I had more than enough loudness from the low-impedance PSB M4U 1, Sony MDR-V6, and Sony MDR-V600 headphones.
Headphone manufacturers have different methods for specifying headphone sensitivity. This makes direct comparisons difficult without doing some math.
Sensitivity is often expressed as dB SPL at 1 mW (acoustic output as a function of input power). This "power sensitivity" specification makes comparisons complicated. This specification tells us nothing about the loudness of the headphones at a given voltage unless we also know the impedance of the headphones.
In contrast, Sennheiser specifies sensitivity in terms of dB SPL at 1 Vrms (acoustic output as a function of input voltage). Sennheiser's "voltage sensitivity" method takes impedance out of the equation and allows direct comparisons without making calculations.
"Power sensitivity" must be converted to "voltage sensitivity" before we can directly compare the loudness of our headphones.
power_sensitivity + 20*LOG(SQRT(1000/R)) = voltage_sensitivity
R is the impedance of the headphones in Ohms
power_sensitivity is expressed as dB SPL @ 1 mW
voltage_sensitivity is expressed as dB SPL @ 1 Vrms
(dB SPL at 1 Vrms)
(dB SPL @ 1 mW)
|Sennheiser HD 650||112||300||107|
|Sennheiser HD 600||112||300||107|
|PSB M4U 1||117||32||102|
I have sorted the table according to "Voltage Sensitivity". The loudest headphones are on the bottom of the chart.
The chart shows that the Sony MDR-V600 headphones are about 7.5 dB louder than the Sennheiser HD 650 headphones when driven from 1 Vrms. We never would have guessed this if we compared the published "Power Sensitivity" column on the right-hand side of the chart. The "Voltage Sensitivity" column explains why the PSB and Sony headphones were noticeably louder in my listening tests.
The chart also shows that the first four headphones all have nearly identical voltage sensitivities. This makes sense because all four seemed to have equal loudness when driven from my Samsung S4. Again, note that the "Power Sensitivity" column is misleading. The Sennheiser headphones are not 11 dB louder than the Audeze, but they produce almost exactly the same acoustic output when driven from the same voltage. The Audeze draw more power than the Sennheisers, but they do not require more voltage.
The first four headphones are only marginally loud enough to work with my portable device. The last three are a better match for the limited output voltage provided by portable devices.
Please note that two of the first four headphones are low-impedance designs but they have the same voltage sensitivity as the high-impedance Sennheiser headphones. The Audeze LCD-X and Grado SR325 are inefficient designs that require both high voltage and high current, making them somewhat unsuitable for portable applications.
Benchmark's HPA2™ headphone amplifier is incorporated into many Benchmark products such as the DAC1 and DAC2 converters. It has three gain ranges to allow adaptation to a wide variety of headphone sensitivities. It is capable of driving 22-Ohm headphones (such as the Audeze), and it is capable of delivering the high voltages required by high-impedance headphones. Any of the above headphones will work well with the HPA2™.
Some high-end headphone amplifiers, such as Benchmark's HPA2™, have very low output impedances. The HPA2™ has an output impedance of about 0.1 Ohms. This very low impedance provides a high damping factor that can improve the control over the headphone drives. This can flatten the frequency response, reduce distortion, and improve damping. See "The 0-Ohm Headphone Amplifier" and "The HPA2™ Headphone Power Amplifier" for more information.
The Sennheiser HD 650 is probably my all-around personal favorite. They sound great and they are comfortable. I find that I can use them with some of my portable devices, but they really shine when driven from a high-quality headphone amplifier.
The Audeze headphones are also outstanding, but only when driven from a high-performance headphone amplifier such as the HPA2™. These headphones are a poor match for portable devices.
When I travel, I carry the PSB headphones. The closed-back design provides excellent isolation, and they have enough sensitivity for my portable devices.
Secrets contributor Sumit Chawla recently caught up with Benchmark’s VP and Chief Designer, John Siau to get a little more in-depth on several subjects.
Q: "Benchmark is one of the few companies that publishes an extensive set of measurements, but you also balance that with subjective testing. Can you talk about the equipment, the listening room, and the process for subjective testing?"
Q: "Was there ever a time where you learned something from a subjective test that was not captured by measurements?"
Q: "You conducted some listening tests to determine whether distortion in the “First Watt” was audible. What test material did you use for this, and what did you find?"
Q: "The AHB2 amplifier incorporates THX Audio Achromatic Amplifier technology. When and how did the partnership with THX come about?"
Q: "Linear power supplies have been and remain quite popular in high-end devices. You favor switch-mode power supplies. When and why did you make this switch?"
... and more!
At Benchmark, listening is the final exam that determines if a design passes from engineering to production. When all of the measurements show that a product is working flawlessly, we spend time listening for issues that may not have shown up on the test station. If we hear something, we go back and figure out how to measure what we heard. We then add this test to our arsenal of measurements.
Benchmark's listening room is equipped with a variety of signal sources, amplifiers and loudspeakers, including the selection of nearfield monitors shown in the photo. It is also equipped with ABX switch boxes that can be used to switch sources while the music is playing.
Benchmark's lab is equipped with Audio Precision test stations that include the top-of-the-line APx555 and the older AP2722 and AP2522. We don't just use these test stations for R&D - every product must pass a full set of tests on one of our Audio Precision test stations before it ships from our factory in Syracuse, NY.
Paul Seydor of The Absolute Sound interviews John Siau, VP and chief designer at Benchmark Media Systems. The interview accompanies Paul's review of the LA4 in the December, 2020 issue of TAS.
"At Benchmark, listening is the final exam that determines if a design passes from engineering to production. But since listening tests are never perfect, it’s essential we develop measurements for each artifact we identify in a listening test. An APx555 test set has far more resolution than human hearing, but it has no intelligence. We have to tell it exactly what to measure and how to measure it. When we hear something we cannot measure, we are not doing the right measurements. If we just listen, redesign, then repeat, we may arrive at a solution that just masks the artifact with another less-objectionable artifact. But if we focus on eliminating every artifact that we can measure, we can quickly converge on a solution that approaches sonic transparency. If we can measure an artifact, we don't try to determine if it’s low enough to be inaudible, we simply try to eliminate it."
- John Siau